By Greg Odogwu
The
Women Environmental Programme (WEP), a non-governmental, non-profit,
non-religious and voluntary organization established in 1997 by a group of
grassroots women in Nigeria, made history by training about twenty five
Nigerian youths on data collection for the purpose of monitoring developmental
governance.
The
training of data collectors was done under the project “Promoting Transparency
and Accountability in Local Government, Through Open Data Collection in Three
Area Councils of FCT, Nigeria”.
The
project, which is being implemented by WEP in collaboration with the National
Bureau Statistics (NBS), with support from Open Knowledge Foundation, under the
African Open Data Collaboration Fund (AODCF), aims at determining the status of
basic amenities, creating awareness on fiscal activities of Area Councils and
eliciting interest of the citizenry to participate effectively in the
development of their communities.
To
understand the significance of this project, one must look at current
socio-political environment in most developing countries. Is it not baffling
that with the perennial political mantra of “delivering the dividends of
democracy” citizens at grassroots are yet to have concrete testimony of these purported
interventions?
For
instance, during the Nigeria’s Presidential Summit on the defunct Millennium
Development Goals, all the state governments’ representatives at the event were
reeling out data on the projects they had undertaken and the lives they were
touching.
Yet,
when hard facts came out on the achievement of the MDGs, it was evident that
Nigeria scored abysmal low points.
And
this situation raises two questions: Given that most of the data on development
process comes from the international community, are these statistics to be
trusted? And then, if the government officials are so certain that they have
affected the lives of the ordinary citizens, how did they scientifically
ascertain the impact of their projects on the grassroots communities whom they
were meant to represent and oversee?
The
answer is manifest in the fact that most poor countries especially in Africa have
no accurate way of gathering data from the grassroots communities. And,
ironically, the ones that come back to us from our foreign development partners
were as a result of foreign-sponsored data collection projects, which are
arguably inefficient, because of overdependence on random sampling and other
haphazard methodologies.
This
is the reason why up to this moment, there are still ongoing debates about the
exact percentages of compliance as regards the achievement of the MDGs. The
statistics and facts concerning its success are still iffy.
And
this is exactly the reason why the world’s governments decided that the current
Sustainable Development Goals should toe a different line of strategy. When
they convened in July 2015 in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia to agree on a framework for
financing the new SDGs, it was agreed that there would be a “key window of
opportunity to improve the existing, haphazard approach to data collection and
reporting”.
Following
the progress made under the MDGs, which
guided global development efforts in the years 2000 to 2015, the world was
determined that the SDGs for the period 2016 to 2030 will continue to fight
against extreme poverty, but will add the challenges of ensuring more equitable
development and environmental sustainability.
Crucial
to their success, therefore, will be strong government systems and in
particular strong statistical systems that can measure and incentivize progress
across the goals.
WEP,
in line with this new paradigm is working with Nigeria’s key statistical
institution, the NBS.
But
most importantly, the NGO has adopted the open data initiative, and is
partnering with the foremost open data organization under African Open Data
Collaboration Fund.
WEP’s
Executive Director, Priscilla Achakpa, revealed that because of Africa’s
peculiar data challenge, the African regional platform during the drafting of
the SDGs had served as midwife for the AODCF.
According
to opendatahandbook.org, open data is data that can be freely used, re-used and
redistributed by anyone – subject only, at most, to the requirement to
attribute and share alike. The data must be available as a whole, and at no
more than a reasonable reproduction cost, preferably by downloading over the
internet.
The
data must be provided under terms that permit re-use and redistribution including
the intermixing with other datasets. And, everyone must be able to use, re-use
and redistribute – there should be no discrimination against fields of endeavor
or against persons or groups. For example, ‘non-commercial’ restrictions that
would prevent ‘commercial’ use, or restrictions of use for certain purposes
(e.g. only in education), are not allowed.
Interestingly,
I see a new vista of youth participation in government, if only the African youth
can catch the vision of this evolving data revolution.
If
the dream of WEP and other similar organizations that are set to train our
youths come to reality, then we can rest assured that a new day has come in
grassroots politics and in general political participation.
I
see that with open data internalized, the days of “political abracadabra” are
numbered. No more will politicians stay inside their campaign offices and
manufacture data of nonexistent community projects with which to lie and
bamboozle the uninformed electorates. Right in the midst of their campaign
crowd will be youths armed with raw data from the field – statistics that have
been professionally and scientifically generated to track governance services
and infrastructure.
On
that day, no politician can “lie” to any constituent anymore; and no government
official can “obfuscate” our international development partners, who are
frustrated by paucity of data and transparent governance which inhibit their
intervention efforts.
And
it is a gladdening development that some youths are catching the vision; and
when they reach the critical mass, they will lift the nation into a new
socio-political paradigm.
Icheen
Ronald Adue, a data collection trainee said his vision of joining the project
was “To bring out the areas government has turned a blind eye to. There are
many NGOs but they are doing little to show impact on the people.”
While
Ogechi Amaram, another trainee, said “I love working with people at the
grassroots. So when I saw this project, I said, yes this is it. This is the way
to give a voice to the voiceless.”
Achakpa,
while commenting on the dynamic of the data collection training, expressed
satisfaction that there was light at the end of the tunnel, because when WEP
advertised the programme via its digital platforms, more than 300 youths
expressed interest to participate, but unfortunately the organization had to
choose only 25.
“It
is sad that today, the young people have become worse sycophants than the
elders. The politicians deceive them with crumbs. But they do not know that
with accurate data on their hand, they will change the game, and decide the
track of governance. I tell these lucky youths we are training: you will train
others, you will monitor the SDGs. Facts and statistics are needed to know when
we have met the current SDGs,” she said.
Therefore,
we all must lend our voices to that of the United Nations in its admonition
that both donors and recipient countries must look to join the data revolution.
The unprecedented rate of innovation in data collection techniques and
technologies and the capacity to distribute data widely and freely has expanded
the horizon of possibility. The adoption of the SDGs presents a strategic
opportunity to build on the momentum of the data revolution and demonstrate the
centrality of data for development.
No comments:
Post a Comment