By
Isaiah Esipisu
NAIROBI, Kenya – Leaders from different landscapes in
Ethiopia, Kenya, and Tanzania have observed that in order to successfully
implement Integrated Landscape Management (ILM) concept, countries must develop
research based policies, strengthen the existing policies, and integrate them.
ILM refers
to long-term collaboration among different groups of land managers and
stakeholders to achieve the multiple objectives required from the landscape.
These typically include agricultural production, provision of ecosystem
services (such as water flow regulation and quality, pollination, climate
change mitigation and adaptation); protection of biodiversity,
landscape beauty, identity and recreation value; and local livelihoods, human
health and well-being.
Dr
Ally-Said Matano, who works for the East African Community at the Lake Victoria
Basin Commission as a Principal Programs Officer responsible for projects and
programs development told a team of experts meeting in Nairobi that existing
policies are sectoral – most of them focusing on just one area.
“To
succeed with ILM, policies must come from the people, be research based, and
must be integrated for easy implementation,” observed Matano.
In
many African countries, agricultural policies for example are not integrated
with environmental policies, or policies in the water sector. Yet, according to
experts, such policies should be crosscutting for easy implementation.
“What
happens in Lake Victoria for example, is the same thing that is happening on
the land,” said Matano. “Pollution from fertilizers on people’s farms, soil
erosion, and even pollution from homesteads all affects the lake,” he said.
He
pointed out that 70 percent of phosphoric contamination in the lake comes from
the farms around the lake. That affects the fisheries sector, water sector,
biodiversity, and the environment in general.
Yet,
the agricultural sector will always insist on policies that promote use of farm
inputs for higher output. “Before enacting such policies, there is need to
invest in research to avoid such conflicts,” said Matano.
The
conflicts are such that environmentalists are developing policies that ensure
conservation of biodiversity, while the agricultural sector is developing
policies that encourage more use of land for improved productivity.
But
the experts observed that even with little land, use of research based
technologies and intensive farming techniques can still assure the agricultural
sector of even higher productivity, thus conserving the ecosystem at the same
time. A policy in that direction will therefore favor both the environment and
agriculture sectors.
In
Tanzania within the Serengeti area for example, there is a policy that allows
controlled harvesting of wild animals. But across the border, on the Kenyan
side in the Mara, the policy completely prohibits poaching. Yet it is the same
ecosystem, same landscape, with same animals crossing the border every now and
then. “Such policies in those two countries need to be harmonised,” said
Matano.
Further,
scientists noted that pests and diseases that affect wild animals also affect
domestic animals. As a result, some policies in the wildlife sector should be
harmonised with policies in the livestock sector.
However,
Verrah Otiende, a research scientist at the World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) pointed
out that sometimes, policy makers create policies on subjects they do not
understand well. “There is need to involve experts, but above all, work with
communities around,” she said.
“Communities,
as well, have unwritten policies that are always relevant to the prevailing
conditions,” said Matano. “For example, they might not know much about climate
change as it is described by scientists, but they will always have adaptation
measures in place,” he said. “You will find them planting sweet potatoes or
cassavas because they understand that climatic conditions have changed, and
that they need some food security crops on their farms.”
Such,
says Matano, are policies that govern the farmers’ way of doing things. It also
means that farmers know exactly what they want, and therefore, they should be
consulted when drafting policies that affect them.
In
the same vein, the experts observed that some of the researches done are not
demand driven, making it difficult to implement. “Many times, people research
for their PhDs, and once they get the paper, that marks the end of the
research,” noted Matano.
“We
need demand driven researches to inform policies,” he said.
So
far, scientists, organisations and communities from different landscapes in the
East African region are already working with various governments to develop
informed policies that will promote ILM.
In
Tanzania for example, the Southern Agricultural Growth Corridor of Tanzania (SAGCOT)
brings together government, business, donor partners and the farming community
to pool resources and work together towards a common goal. The organisation is
an agricultural partnership designed to improve agricultural productivity, food
security and livelihoods in the country.
In Kenya,
according to David Kuria, founder and member of Kijabe Environment Volunteers
(KENVO), and works in the Lari-Kijabe Focal Landscape, the organisation is
collaborating with the County Government of Kiambu to develop policies that
will promote ILM.
Above all,
the scientists pointed out that all policies should be implemented within the
law so as to give them a legal backing.
The Nairobi meeting brought together leaders from the learning landscapes in Ethiopia, Kenya, and Tanzania to exchange knowledge and experiences on ILM, and to learn about tools to enhance their implementation of ILM.
Isaiah Esipisu is a Nairobi based
freelance journalist specializing in agriculture, environment and climate
change reporting. esipisus@yahoo.com
END
No comments:
Post a Comment